Archive for the National Affairs Category

We Shall Not Study War Anymore

Posted in Foreign Policy, National Affairs, The Faith Community with tags , , on May 18, 2013 by thomassobottke

“He Shall judge among the nations. And shall rebuke many peoples and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into prunninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.”
Isaiah 2:4

“The Congress shall have the power to: “declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules Concerning Captures on Land and Water.”
Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States

Senator Barbara Lee, a Democrat from California has introduced H.R. 198-Repeal of the Authorization for Use of Military Force. In the emotional and panic stricken weeks following 911 the Congress largely gave away its Constitutional duty as well as its authority to declare war.

The initiation of war with other nations, factions, groups, and individuals is among the most serious decisions our Federal Government in Washington must make. From the very inauguration of the United States Constitution in 1789 the very first Congress onward has the primary if not sole authority to authorize the President as Commander-In-Chief to wage war using the United States military.

The Executive Branch has always had full authority under the Constitution of the United States to defend our people and borders and even to wage war in defense of the nation when it comes upon us quickly, and without our beginning it. So the base needs of the Executive Branch to make war in response to threats to the national security are fully protected even in that original supreme law of the land with regard to Homeland Security in the post 911 era of terrorism.

Anyone who wants to understand fully the argument that Presidents have always had the authority to defend the United States with military force when we are attacked suddenly and to use our means of gathering intelligence to anticipate those threats should read a classic book by Arthur Schlesinger Jr. on the powers of the Presidency he wrote back in 1973. Carte blanche authority to make war deprives our people of the help Congress might provide in making decisions on all elective wars and any military strikes that are not so constrained by time to decide. And it is how our Constitution is supposed to work. Congress, not the Executive Branch, has the full authority to declare war.

What happened in 2001 was that a panic stricken Congress gave the President and our military industrial complex the power to decide for themselves about war and peace. As a result we have been in a constant state of war since 911. War has become the normal state of affairs rather than peace.

Senator Barbara Lee was one of the very few sage members of Congress to vote against that blanket authorization of power for the Executive Branch to decide on war back in 2001. It is long past time to repeal this broad authority to make war and return at least part of that authority back to the oversight of Congress—representing more fully all of the people of the United States and with a more deliberative function.

H.R. 198 says in part: “Repeal of the Authorization for Use of Military Force—States that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (P.L. 107-40) has been used to justify an open-ended authorization for the use of military force and such an interpretation is inconsistent with authority of Congress to declare war and make all laws for executing powers vested by the Constitution in the U.S. government.”

Our nation needs to follow the good advice of the Lord as communicated to us from the sage Prophet Isaiah to beat some swords into plowshares and to make peace and not war the norm. What we have done is to prevent Congress from having the necessary oversight into policies from the nature and number of drone strikes, the use of rendition for terror suspects, the continuing existence of the prison at Guantanamo Bay, and what can now be de facto declarations of war by the Executive Branch before Congress can even exercise its Constitutional duty and authority about war.

In the enfolding wings of peace the peoples of the world can rest easier. Children can come to adulthood without fear and they won’t have their lives cut short by war’s cruelties. Nation’s might then lie down like the lion and the lamb as given us in the Scriptures. Yet, if a threat comes to us like a mother protecting her children the United States can and should be able to make war. Barbara Lee’s bill H.R. 198 makes that more likely and restores the natural balance of power between the Executive and Legislative branches of our government intended by the founders.

Legalized Abortion Leads Directly to School Shootings and Terrorist 911′s Says North Dakota Congressman Kevin Cramer

Posted in National Affairs, The Faith Community with tags , , on May 16, 2013 by thomassobottke

North Dakota Congressman Kevin Cramer sees the onset of legalized abortion after Roe vs. Wade with such a complete decline in moral values that the school shootings, gun violence. Terrorism of 911 and Boston are all related to the ability of women to choose.

It could be much better argued that if the perpetrators of these crimes had been aborted the gun violence in our nation would be less. But even Struggles for Justice will not go there or suggest such a thing.

So what is it really that Cramer sees as the root cause of all our nation’s troubles?

“Innocent people in New York have airplanes flown into their places of work, and marathoners in Boston are victims of bombs, yet Christianity is singled out as bigotry in our public institutions because politicians and academics lack the courage to speak truth. We’ve normalized perversion and perverted God’s natural law to the point where the only thing not tolerated anymore is a stand for truth.”

And what is that truth?

James Dobson, Founder of Focus on the Family, put it this way:
“I mean millions of people have decided that God doesn’t exist or he’s irrelevant to me and we have killed fifty-four million babies and the institution of marriage is right on the verge of a complete redefinition,” Dobson intoned. “I think we have turned our back on the Scripture and on God Almighty and I think he has allowed judgment to fall upon us. I think that’s what’s going on.”

If that is true, no one and no nation and no world can escape God’s horrible judgment and wrath. We are all the walking dead now.

Struggles for Justice believes that we do live in a much more skeptical world in regard to religious belief in God than was true a century ago. We live in a broken and sinful world. But we are called as Christians to be an extension of God’s voice and hands in that broken world. But those voices and hands must be heard as God’s love, forgiveness and mercy more than as God’s judgment to destroy innocent people for the sins or what some of us perceive as the sins of others.

We live in a nation where you are not forced to be a Christian fundamentalist who rails against anyone who is not. Human beings are given by the Creator free choice to accept her or reject her.

Once again the right wing nuts are active and as loony as ever. We may have widely divergent opinions about legalized abortion in America but under our Supreme Law it is legal. That is reality. And the people who shoot down others in tens and twenties in public places and the terrorists who kill in mass using airplanes and bombs are not really making a statement about abortion. Sometimes they themselves do not know why they do what they do.

When it comes to gun violence the prevalence of guns and a culture that sees guns as the way to settle any problem or grievance is probably closer to the cause of the trouble than abortion is.

If the Cramer’s and the Dobson’s of the world are right then we are dead already—Zombie unbelievers –and God’s judgment is already being carried out. It is not for us to challenge the will of God at all. It’s a done deal guys so save your strength and make yourselves ready for the horrible death God is going to make our fate if only to tell us he is angry at our misbehavior and sinfulness. There was a Jewish Rabbi a couple of thousand years ago who offered us a God who was merciful, compassionate, loving, and only wanted that kind of relationship with us. If God merely wants to kill to show us the error of our ways why stop him? We cannot stop him. It is the manifest destiny of humankind to be destroyed.

But Struggles for Justice has greater faith in God than these men do. Despite the brokenness of our world Jesus’ command to love one another and to see him, the Son of God, the Holy Spirit, and the Father as loving and merciful—the grace of God was and is central to faith. It is not to be a cheering section who like the prophets of old tells us we are going to be punished and will die for our sins. Christ’s whole message was precisely the opposite fellas.

Obama’s Scandal Fest

Posted in Community and Citizen Action, National Affairs with tags , , , , , on May 15, 2013 by thomassobottke

Three scandals in as many days erupt to engulf the Obama Administration and President Barack Obama is now being compared unfavorably to Richard Nixon. Is this the end? Is Obama the most corrupt President ever? Is he a radical Muslim Socialist Kenya- born Mau-Mau revolutionary bent on destroying America? Nah.

Benghazi

President Obama should admit the infamous talking points were changed to protect the integrity of the CIA’s ongoing hunt for the terrorists who made the attack on the consulate and that his campaign of course put a bit of spin on the news of the event during the height of a presidential campaign. Romney had been spinning it so much in the fall of 2012 that he was going harder and faster than a whirling Dervish. As to the rest, the 29 Recommendations of the Accountability Board Report are being implemented by the State Department. And now it is most important to catch and destroy the people who killed those four Americans at the consulate—it is as simple as that.

IRS Scandal

First of all, the acting head of the IRS should be fired along with the woman who was the immediate supervisor to the people who used Tea Party and Patriot to find organizations as a shortcut to find the slew of organizations attempting to get tax exempt status as 501-C4’s. The people in the Washington office should be asked to tender their resignations and the President should accept them. The President should do two things: one, ask for a special prosecutor in the case himself—don’t wait for members of Congress. Two: President Obama and the Democrats in Congress should introduce legislation further clarifying that 501-C4 organizations are truly those that aid the welfare of society and are NOT organizations that spend millions to lobby Congress or the public for or against candidates for public office or toward any specific public issue, political party, or legislation. If you want to do that you will have to pay taxes and report your donors. That should reduce the overwhelming workload of processing so many applications for 501-C4 status from both political parties and their surrogates that flooded the IRS in the wake of the Citizens United Supreme Court decision and that produced the attempt to make a shortcut in processing them that both disrespected the public taxpayer and citizen organizations in the first place. The President is NOT involved in this scandal at all.

Associated Press – DOJ

Attorney General Eric Holder properly recused himself from the investigation into the leak about the person who has been used to penetrate El Qaeda in Yemen and foil a huge terrorist plot that could have brought down one or more airliners. It is a proper criminal investigation. But the subpoenas calling for the phone records of hundreds of journalists at the AP or with AP affiliations were much too broad and wide ranging. It is a serious violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution. Secretary Holder’s inability to take charge and act to deal with this and his lame excuses in two press conferences now require that President Obama ask for and receive Secretary Holder’s resignation. The Deputy Attorney General should be fired outright and another put in his place who understands how to more selectively use this power to investigate via subpoena and how important it is not to restrict freedom of the press.

There you have it. President Obama and the White House Staff subscribe to this blog’s posts so it is hoped they are paying attention to this very solid advice. Here the President should have a brief press conference where he announces personally the actions he has already taken and then he ought to get right on the road to hammer away at the need for job creation and immigration reform as Congress gets set to make a second vote in the Senate on gun background checks.

End of Scandal Fest. Will the Administration do these things? If not, they can forget about anything meaningful in the entire second term and perhaps look forward to the impeachment of the President at the very least.

Heritage Foundation Reaches the Same Conclusion: Jason Richwine Resigns

Posted in National Affairs, Race on May 10, 2013 by thomassobottke

The Heritage Foundation announced the resignation of Analyst Jason Richwine citing problems with his Harvard Ph.D. dissertation suggesting Hispanics have naturally lower IQ’s than white Anglo-Saxons do. For whatever reasons he makes in the dissertation it is something that is unacceptable in the growing diversity of the 21st Century. Harvard and the nation would have loved his ideas a little over a century ago when Scientific Racism measured people’s skulls to demonstrate white Anglo-Saxons had the most brain capacity. A racial Anglo-Saxonism characterized America at the end of the nineteenth-century and we were more easily led into the Philippines and our war there between 1898-1903 believing those brown people were unfit to govern themselves at all and making it easier to do away with some 600,000 of them over those years. We ought not go back to that time now. The Heritage Foundation made the correct move asking Dr. Richwine to resign his position. Even they do not concur with his views. (see previous story White Conservatives to Latinos: You have Lower IQ’s and you Cost Too Much to Be Americans.)
The Editors/Struggles for Justice

White Conservatives to Latinos: You Have Lower IQ’s and Making You Americans Costs Too Much

Posted in Essays, National Affairs, Race on May 9, 2013 by thomassobottke

A new Heritage Foundation Study on Immigration puts the cost of Immigration Reform at 6.3 trillion dollars, fully half the size of the entire United States economy. The numbers are derived from the assumption that undocumented immigrants as well as those who are here legally will use public services and welfare and other programs at extremely high rates well above the levels they presently use them prior to immigration reform. The study also notably does not factor in immigrants as contributing a single damn thing to economic growth. It is a worst case scenario study whose numbers are just out in thin air. Enough said.

A Co-author of the study, Jason Richwine, wrote what can only be described as a highly racist and white supremacist doctoral dissertation for a public policy Ph.D. he earned at Harvard University. The Heritage Foundation, backtracking from endorsing Richwine’s work, and its own study, points out that they do not endorse Richwine’s doctoral dissertation from Harvard, though they have hired Richwine as a senior analyst at the Heritage Foundation where he works. And he did in fact co-author the study concerned whatever role he played in the completion of the study.

If the guy’s primary contribution to his field is so objectionable, Struggles for Justice asks why you guys at the Heritage Foundation hired him in the first place?

Here is a key argument from Richwine’s doctoral dissertation that makes you wonder what his defense of the dissertation at Harvard was like and what his three member faculty committee thought of the work:

“The average IQ of immigrants in the United States is substantially lower than that of the white native population, and the difference is likely to persist over several generations. The consequences are a lack of socioeconomic assimilation among low-IQ immigrant groups, more underclass behavior, less social trust, and an increase in the proportion of unskilled workers in the American labor market.”

Richwine went on to comment, “No one knows whether Hispanics will reach IQ parity with whites but that they’ll have low-IQ children and grandchildren is difficult to argue against.”

Republican Senator and presumptive 2016 Presidential nominee Marco Rubio of Florida called the Heritage Foundation study “deeply flawed.” Oddly, Jim De Mint, previously one of the most prominent Republican conservative white men in the U.S. Senate and the new director of the Foundation was the key player in managing and helping fund Rubio’s successful Senatorial run in 2010. Historically, the Heritage Foundation has provided the underpinning for a host of Republican policies and positions over the past several decades.

Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced 23 Amendments to the 844 page Immigration Reform bill now before the United States Senate. One key Amendment would restrict lawfully employed previously undocumented (illegal) immigrants to work in “Domestic Service.” The jobs opened to Latinos are to be the following:

“Cooks, waiters, butlers, housekeepers, governesses, maids, valets, baby sitters, janitors, laundresses, furnacemen, [Sic.]care-takers, handymen, gardeners, footmen, grooms, and chauffeurs of automobiles for family use.”

Now all of these jobs are good jobs and jobs that can and are held with dignity— needed to help fuel the U.S. economy. But nowhere in Senator Lee’s Amendment does he list managerial, entrepreneurial, and jobs requiring college degrees that would make Latinos upwardly mobile in American society.

The Amendment itself is racist on its face and harkens back to jobs available to blacks in the Jim Crow South and even in the De-facto segregated Northern states.

According to Texas Democratic Congressman Ruben Hinojosa, the Chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, “The Heritage Foundation has always been a stalwart of conservatism, but this is commonplace, ugly, racism and xenophobia dressed up in economic hyperbole.” Hinojosa went on to say that “Richwine’s assertions show a man with a flawed understanding of human nature and of immigration. Those who come to America to seek freedom and opportunity arrive with the intent to work hard to build a new life.”

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow had New York Magazine columnist Frank Rich on her program and he had this comment:

“It’s a fascinating battle within the base (of the Republican Party) exemplified by these clowns. If I may use that word. How are they going to do this, how are they going to square the circle? They claim to be welcoming Latinos and are literally insulting their intelligence and even their unborn children’s intelligence. Grandchildren that aren’t even here yet are already being called mentally inferior.”

That is just the point. The Republican Party has and is reaching out to Latinos and blacks and other people of color in order to reverse the disastrous 2012 Election. But all of this raises serious doubts about the sincerity of the moves they are making—whether or not they are really serious about broadening the demographic appeal of the Party.

According to The Daily Beast, “The Republican Party isn’t a racist organization, and conservatism isn’t a racist ideology. Nevertheless, over the last four years, the figures and organizations that have hit hot water over racially charged rhetoric have been overwhelmingly right wing. And survey after survey shows a conservative community that is more likely than other Americans to hold negative opinions about blacks.“

Struggles for Justice concludes that white conservatives remain predominantly racially prejudiced and the political party that speaks for them, the Republican Party, has not been truly sincere about making the huge demographic changes in the make-up of the Party that are so needed for America at large.

You can’t convince people who have been traditionally discriminated against that they are welcome in your political party and its policy positions when those same positions and the way you are acting insults the intelligence of those people and displays a racially prejudiced view of American society.

Instead of believing that the Republican Party has turned over a new leaf with its self-evaluation of their own political defeat, it should be concluded here that white conservatives, overwhelmingly concentrated in the Republican and Tea Party groups, remain as they always have been—unwelcoming to people of color and maintaining policies that are simply not in the interest of those same people who have faced discrimination as immigrants or forced migrants first held in slavery and since then dismissed as being lesser beings by the white majority set to drop off the face of the Earth around 2043 or 2045 whatever Census projections you choose to consult.

Racism is alive and well in the United States and we know who the racists are. This is not only great news for the Democratic Party but it does clarify what people of color need to avoid and condemn in the political arena.

White conservatives, you have been caught with your racial prejudice hanging out.

The Sequester Cuts in Human Terms: The Rejection of the “Least of These”

Posted in Community and Citizen Action, National Affairs, The Faith Community on May 7, 2013 by thomassobottke

For members of Congress, and quite honestly we are talking about Republican Conservative members of Congress, the Sequestration Cuts made earlier this year are just numbers. When these people discovered that air traffic controllers and safety personnel generally were being furloughed, inconveniencing the wealthy and powerful, they made an exception to it. Now they are prepared to exempt needed cancer treatment. That is a good thing too. But there are so many more human beings who lack the influence and the power and the ability to give voice to how this form of meat ax budget cutting is hurting them.

Lifting up conservative Republican members of Congress as being the primary culprits here is not a partisan action. It is declaring what is factually true about the indifference to the little people of our nation who matter so little to them. These are the “least of these” mentioned in the Holy Bible of Christians and even in Judaic texts shared with Christians. Liberal and even moderate Democrats are paying attention to the least of these as is the President. What were such terrible cuts to prevent anyone from allowing them to take effect so as to produce a grand budget deal, are now seen as permanent and the minimum required by anti-government and since the government is us, anti-humanity Republican Conservatives.

It begins with the attitude that the poor, the unemployed and even those retiring in old age are undeserving of help from government in addition to what might be available through public charity.

Many hard line conservatives in this country connect poverty and unemployment with criminal behavior and with the inability to be responsible human beings who have value as people. Therefore, cutting the poor off from what they have gotten from government to maintain themselves becomes a virtue to these people.

Even Social Security and Medicare are seen as “entitlements.” A man might say with blunt honesty, “entitlements my ass!” Anyone who receives these program benefits have worked all their lives and given a portion of their honest daily bread into funds specifically earmarked for their retirement. If you receive or are about to receive, or are merely contributing to these programs on your paycheck you are earning these benefits honestly and with integrity. Instead of entitlements we should refer to such programs as” earned benefit programs.” For that is precisely what they are.

Poverty and unemployment programs from government simply go to those who truly are the “least of these” given special protection by God in the statement that “the first shall be last and the last shall be first.” In God’s heavenly kingdom, the people with the cold hearts and indifferent minds to the needs of the most vulnerable among us will certainly be last in line to join the heavenly choir. Perhaps they will not even be there to join such a choir at all. They will reap what they sow.

Even those of us who are not indifferent to the suffering of the poor and sick and elderly and those with the inability to get the ear of someone of wealth or power have a duty to go to the aid of these people. In some cases they might even be people just like us.

The Sequestration Cuts are cutting out whole classrooms of head start students who desperately need that head start to get out of a life of poverty and hopelessness and to achieve.

They are reducing the government subsidy to Meals on Wheels programs all over the nation. Not only do elderly people who can no longer easily care for themselves get meals that sustain them and their health, but they get the brotherhood and sisterhood of visiting Meals on Wheels volunteers. Most of those folks will be served by private donations. But many will be cut from the program simply because the government subsidy has been cut in the sequestration cuts of last March. These are real people. They are no longer able to work and get what they need and they physically cannot feed themselves properly and they need that human contact when the smiling face of that Meals on Wheels volunteer comes in with their meal and says hello and checks on them.

The Sequestration Cuts do not meet the human needs of a significant number of vulnerable Americans.

Let that be repeated for emphasis: the Sequestration Cuts do not meet the human needs of a significant number of vulnerable Americans.

It is this that ails the conservative anti-government budget cutting fanatics that rarely go outside the cocoon of the Washington Beltway and their jet trips to their nice homes where these programs are largely irrelevant to them.

Everything government does to protect the health and safety of human beings and to reach out and aid those least able to take care of themselves is affected by these budget cuts which by law must be across the board cuts, meaning that being selective in what is cut is an impossibility.

Even the Department of Defense is getting serious cuts which first off affect the combat readiness of our armed forces to defend the United States. The original idea behind such severe cuts on a meat ax basis rather than the fine knife of a skilled surgeon was to scare defense Hawks, mostly Republicans and a few Democrats into not permitting these things to go into effect last March. They not only permitted it but lauded the cuts as being a good thing that they wish to extend to more people by making the cuts even larger!

Our Veterans have to wait a long time to get the treatment in veteran’s hospitals we have promised them! They then get less adequate care when they do get treatment.

And our military families will NOT benefit from the Sequestration Cuts at all. If anything, those now actively serving in combat zones and here training and refitting further at home are being hurt.

This is a huge moral lapse on the part of a significant number of our leaders. The nation possesses the wealth to take care of the most vulnerable people among us. But the will or moral sensibility to use it is lacking completely.

God knows. God surely knows that so many millions are being mistreated. He sees and notes even the fall of a sparrow and each hair on our heads. So says Holy Scripture. And God keeps his promises and only speaks what is true.

We are witnessing a total failure of our leaders to both lead and to represent the popular will of all our people, not just the most favored, the wealthy and powerful among us. It is a direct rejection of the biblical command, not a mere suggestion to both take care of “the least of these” of God’s children and to love one another as God loves us.

In Washington D.C. the indifference to the poor and the lowly and to human beings on an individual basis where a budgetary number on a page somewhere meets them in their daily lives is being ignored at great peril to the nation and to those who have done this terrible thing.

It is a rejection of care for “the least of these” that a higher power that is bigger than mere mortal humans who only for such a short time inhabit this Earth and wield such power.

Ought they pay more attention to how they do it in light of what God commands and expects of us in just about every religion and system of ethics you might wish to consult?

Those who are first now ought to remember that “the first shall be last and the last shall be first” in God’s kingdom. Self-interest alone ought to be enough to get this unjust law to be repealed. Reaching out to help our fellow human beings because we love God and God wants us to help is why most of us oppose this legislation.

Let us embrace the most vulnerable and more than meet their human needs. Let us embrace a common humanity where we all owe something to each other beyond our own self-interest and comfort. Let us follow the biblical command to love one another. Let us do it with great urgency and energy right now

NRA’s Wayne La Pierre, Ted Nugent, and Allies: You Lie

Posted in Community and Citizen Action, Essays, National Affairs with tags , , , on May 5, 2013 by thomassobottke

As the NRA’s National Convention winds down in Houston it would be easy to conclude that the United States is engaged in one huge fight to have the rights contained within the Second Amendment respected. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Absolutely no one in the growing movement for gun safety has suggested a single gun owned and possessed by a law abiding American citizen be taken away from them, nor has there been any suggestion of jailing or harassing gun owners at all.

The most severe measure, introduced by California Senator Diane Feinstein that would ban military assault weapons and limit the size of magazines does not call for the confiscation of a single gun. There is not even a buy-back program in the offing.

The United States has four and a half percent of the planet’s population yet we possess forty percent of the guns on the planet—ten times our share of the Earth’s population. We have 88.9 guns per 100 persons here or just over 270 million firearms. Most are concentrated in the hands of gun enthusiasts—right where they ought to be.

Dr. Garen Wintemute at the University of California at Davis Medical Center whose specialty is emergency medicine declares that the United States is not a more violent society than most nations. Yet we do lead by a long margin in our homicide rate. “That is a weapon effect,” says Wintemute. “It’s not clear that guns cause violence, but it’s absolutely clear that they change the outcome.”

The Second Amendment is to ensure that the right for States to maintain well regulated militias is not infringed upon in our law or by practice of government. A well-regulated militia is the kind where some State official, or even a Federal one calls adults into service of maintaining order or defending our nation and places them under some sort of formalized military discipline so they not become common vigilantes.

Since our nation has over the two plus centuries of its existence relied so much on the citizen soldier—the volunteer– this right is highly prized. State governments were supposed to be able to maintain State militias to prevent a national government from trampling upon the rights of individual citizens. State and local government is to be the repository of citizen solider forces in cases of dire emergency. Yet even then, those volunteers are placed under the direction and control of some elected official of the State—that of your State’s Governor being the most common practice.

Note that these militias only receive protection under the Constitution if they are “well regulated.” This is defined under four major militia acts passed by the Congress over the years.

By long practice, going back to those first shots at Lexington and Concord in 1775, we Americans have grown accustomed to expect the Second Amendment’s protection for our private, personal possession of firearms. That expectation is fully recognized under the Amendment enacted in 1791 and will always remain so. If any foreign hostile force comes to our shores, a criminal threatens our safety or that of our family, if we want to target shoot, collect, or hunt we have that right under the United States Constitution. That is different from all the other nations on Earth except for Canada and New Zealand. We do not license gun owners and their individual firearms and we should not.

But limiting the destructive power of weapons American citizens can possess, and requiring background checks to assist duly sworn law enforcement in sorting out those who may pose a danger to the law abiding among us not only is permitted under our Constitution it is surprisingly effective in running down criminals with weapons or those declared by our courts after full due process to be mentally unfit to possess firearms.

It is this that the National Rifle Association’s leadership and right-wing pundits have been opposing. They have been declaring a fight over basic gun rights when there is none to be had. They have mischaracterized—yes they lie– to the American people about what the newly proposed gun safety measures actually will do and what they mean for the Second Amendment.

What really is part of the problem as far as liberals like those at Struggles for Justice is that many of us do not understand that the overwhelming majority of gun owners are our allies in the effort to reduce the violence that guns are responsible for. These good citizens—gun owners all, are the good guys. Most liberals do not understand that. That must change. The broader culture associated with the culture of guns is not the problem either. It is the criminal, the mentally deranged, and the young not yet responsible enough to possess their own guns outside of adult supervision we ought to focus on.

The long held tradition of having one or more firearms to protect you and your family, and having one or more adults in the household ready to respond to the call of a Governor or some other State official in a dire emergency where defending the nation or keeping order is concerned is as American as apple pie as the saying goes. Teaching young adults in a family the safe use of firearms and taking them hunting or target shooting carries no intrinsic dangers so long as those concerned are part of strong families with a tradition or long experience of doing this safely. Let us trust them to do it.

We have many different environments for gun ownership in the United States. Well policed suburban places or urban ones or where lots of small children are around might not be the best places for a lot of guns to be present in the household. Our schools, churches, hospitals, offices, and taverns are not good places to have weapons. Homes, hunting grounds, shooting ranges, or concealed carry by permit where allowed by law are better choices.

By Sharp contrast, somebody that lives in a rural area, where hunting is common and law enforcement aid is going to be a long wait need ready access to firearms. They need and most often possess good gun safety knowledge. The choice of owning a gun or not is as individual as Americans are themselves.

But lying about the honest efforts of Americans and their representatives to get guns out of the hands of criminals or the criminally insane and to limit certain types of weapons and to use layman’s terminology: the number of bullets and how fast they can be fired—along with giving police the help they need in running down those who traffic illegal guns are all sensible responses to the increasing violence from guns we are seeing in America now.

In point of fact, the vast majority of gun owners agree with these proposed measures before the Congress and support continued efforts to pass legislation promoting gun safety. No one is suggesting anything remotely close to the banning of gun ownership. That is what is so odd. Americans lining up to fight something that is not at risk or having a fight no one else is looking for and where there is no need of it.

Worst of all, the leadership of the National Rifle Association (NRA) and its allies in Congress, and in the conservative media have let the nation down with their lies, and with their absurd suggestions that gun violence calls for more and more guns in the hands of more and more people in more and more situations—even five year old boys getting their first gun to shoot. Common sense ought to prevail. Common sense is utterly lacking in the NRA today and its fellow travelers.

The NRA’s bad behavior—its extremism on the gun issue– is a direct betrayal of the millions of good citizens of this nation who own and use firearms. By and large these are good people who represent the best of what our nation has to offer: and yes, liberals and their non- gun-owning cohorts too. (Liberals own guns and love their Second Amendment rights too.)

The most detestable thing of all is the glaring affront to the grieving families of those gunned down in America; the parents and families of the Sandy Hook, Aurora, Tucson and Virginia Tech and Oak Creek. Those of you who swim in Wayne La Pierre’s fevered mind and world have to answer to those people directly for the obstruction and evil blathering’s you have made.

Prisons for Profit: Wisconsin Leads in Prison Incarceration Rate

Posted in Community and Citizen Action, Essays, National Affairs, Race, The Faith Community with tags , , on April 28, 2013 by thomassobottke

When your State is the national leader in locking up convicted criminals the first reaction would be to celebrate the superb police work and safe streets. But when the real reasons are a prison industry where private firms handle the overflow of inmates for profit, where the nation’s long- time drug war has targeted entire communities of people of color based on race, and politicians fear being labeled soft on crime there is little if anything to be happy about.

Two categories where the United States of America is the unequaled world leader is the number of citizens per one hundred thousand we imprison, and in our defense budget for the military where we spend six times the next two nations put together. What does that say about us?

The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee’s Employment and Training Institute has issued a report written by John Pawasarat and Lois M. Quinn that just over half of African-American males and an increasing number of females from their 30’s to 40’s have already done prison time in troubled Milwaukee County. Too many of them are already felons. Any scholars studying how to employ and train Wisconsin workers would have to be staggered by that statistic. For people who have done prison time, who are African-American, and in many cases are felons, who already are most likely not to have sufficient means of even obtaining family-supporting jobs even with those three strikes against them, are never going to be truly employable. That too becomes a drag on the State’s economy.

What does that mean for Wisconsin and so many states with similar problems? It means these people will be more likely to re-offend and be imprisoned again at great public expense, and when they are not doing time they will be dependent upon public assistance as they are more likely to be out of work for extended periods and unable to support themselves or a family. The effects on families are incredibly destructive. Both men and women who are in prison cannot be with their children, they often lose custody of those children, and put enormous pressure on the foster care system to say nothing of the sadness and loss the kids themselves experience when they are buffeted about in and out of foster care. The process is both enormously destructive and self-perpetuating.

This is nothing short of a social meltdown so profound that it threatens what is left of any Middle Class in America, it makes a complete mockery of the American Dream, and it reveals that race is still very much a factor. According to Michelle Alexander in her new book The New Jim Crow, blacks are twenty six times more likely to be imprisoned for drug offenses than are their white counterparts who live in communities not targeted specifically for the resource rich war on drugs. Worst of all, a large proportion of these people have their lives ruined by non-violent offenses—many times possession and use of controlled substances where they are the victims of chemical dependencies requiring treatment rather than prison.

According to Joel Gaughan, the leader of WISDOM/MICAH’s 11X15 Program, it costs taxpayers $32,000 a year to incarcerate a person and only $8,000 per year to treat that same person instead. If treatment is the option, parents, and especially women, can hold on to their kids and get the treatment they need, and then emerge to fight another day—perhaps being in a better position to find that rare job and support themselves and their children and get off public assistance.
Gaughan explains the 11 X 15 program this way: the social justice organization seeks to have the Wisconsin prison population down to 11,000 by 2015 the end of a State Biennial Budget year. Presently we are paying $32.000 per prisoner for well over 25,000 people per year. That’s a lot of money.

Wisconsin already has treatment programs in places that cost just $8,000 per year, and keeps families together, and gives people a chance to earn a living and not to become completely dependent upon the taxpayer for their lifetimes. Treatment programs are NOT available to violent or repeat offenders—those people no one wants on the streets at all. Those people are worth spending $32,000 per year to keep away from law abiding citizens. But the tens of thousands of people in Wisconsin prisons alone who are not violent and not a threat to the public safety are ill-served when we lock them up. And the taxpayers foot the entire bill for our fiscal stupidity–even imbecility here.

What the 11 X 15 program wants from the Wisconsin Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee is to simply get spending in treatment programs up to $25 million in the proposed State budget. Gaughan believes that $75 million would be a more realistic figure if we were to do justice to these vulnerable people in our prisons—even that a mere fraction of what we spend on our State prison system in total.

The long view of this issue is the great injustice of our “so called” justice system—a system that is so distorted and racially unjust that it makes the majority of black men in Milwaukee County in particular into criminals instead of productive human beings. It harms women in prison who are adequate if not good mothers—whose kids still want mommy to be there for them and locks them up when they need treatment for their chemical dependency much more. Treatment sets the offender on a path toward being in a much better position to both provide restitution to anyone hurt in a property crime and to become employed and not putting more pressure on the taxpayer.

Marc Mauer the author of Race to Incarcerate and the Director of the Sentencing Project sees clearly how the Prison-Industrial Complex or what Struggles for Justice has referred to as the U.S. Injustice System destroys lives and destroys families too. Mauer sees prisoners as economic commodities where states build prisons in rural areas where land is cheap and the prison system itself becomes a job producer and economic stimulus of the worst kind. That does not include the trend to farm out prisoners to private for profit firms more interested in the bottom line than actual justice and the incarceration of prisoners in a humane and safe way—not to mention a Constitutional way honoring due process under law.

The prison incarceration boom we have been living with in the last twenty plus years is not a product of rising crime rates. “While rising crime rates from the mid-1960’s to the mid-1970’s (in large part a function of the” baby boom” generation coming of age) helps to explain the early part of this rise, since 1980 the prison expansion has been primarily a result of “get tough” policies,” Mauer says. On the Federal level and now the State level too we have been sending more people to prison for ever longer periods of time.

Again it is important to point out that no one among the reform movement here wants to release violent offenders or serious repeat offenders who would be a danger to the public safety and whose crimes are so heinous or so destructive of private property that they must remain incarcerated.

Yet, it is the large number of non-violent, often first-time offenders caught up in the drug war and mandatory sentencing policies in force since the 1980’s or 1990’s. numbers of black and Latino populations live to apply the heat in the war on drugs.

The result is a prison population that reflects a terrible racial bias. The essence of Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow is that the Federal government has funneled ever more money to State and local law enforcement that have in tern focused on urban areas where large —racial injustice so huge that it is patently race-based in its application. Alexander uses legions of studies, reports, and statistics to tell her story how a new Jim Crow like system employees the criminal justice system to control people of color where the old system no longer is permitted by law due to the gains in civil rights during the movement peak in the 1950’s and 1960’s landmark civil rights legislation.

Struggles for Justice lifts up the people who are so terribly harmed by these policies and what has truly become a prison for profit, racially determinative, U.S. Injustice System.

What is so self-evident here is that a radical change in our criminal justice prison policies toward restitution and treatment for non-violent offenders is both fiscally more sound and socially just as well. It is time to listen to those advocating programs like 11 X 15 in Wisconsin and elsewhere. Lawmakers tasked with making prison policy have that rare opportunity to both relieve the overburdened taxpayer and do what is right and good and just at the very same time.

From Alex Jones Black Ops, the Glenn Beck Conspiracy Directed World to Fox News and Right Wing Media Calls to Attack Islam by Thomas Martin Sobottke

Posted in Education, Essays, Foreign Policy, National Affairs, Race, The Faith Community on April 25, 2013 by thomassobottke

If you get your information about the outside world from Alex Jones of Infowars.com everything that happens in our world and in yours individually is some sort of government or Muslim-led conspiracy against everybody else. Just as Abraham Lincoln used pinpoint logic to note that as both the Union and Confederacy prayed to the very same God for victory only one of them or perhaps neither of them would get what they wanted, so it is truth itself that if everything that happens in the world is a conspiracy there would need to be multitudes of conspirators who somehow keep the lid on everything. Our own personal free will and long and direct experience with it would be just an illusion.

When I put my hand on a hot burner on the stove and it gets burned it is not a government conspiracy. Beyond being a rather stupid thing to do the pain and the very real injury caused would be proof of my freedom of action—the base line of reality versus a dangerous fantasy. My government has not conspired to do this. I’ve burned myself cooking numerous times and my own mother told me not to do it just as she told you to look before crossing the street.

General Electric has an ad currently running which plays on this conspiratorial world image with a guy telling us about modern medical technology in shades, with communications device in his ear and a dark suit, a creep me out voice, and offering a kid a choice of a blue or red lollypop. There have been the Men in Black films, and so many thrillers in print and on the screen about huge government plots to destroy us all that we are now buying into it as reality.

NBC’s Brian Williams noted that we’ve failed to see the most obvious thing about the Boston Marathon bombers: they are cold blooded killers—common but extremely dangerous mass murderers–criminals. Endowing them with almost superhuman qualities as sinister behind-the-scenes members of a huge government conspiracy to kill Americans and enslave us is the product of illogic and emotion over crisp, controlled reason.

And yes, Struggles for Justice knows that General Electric owns NBC. But that does not mean their latest ad campaign to sell us the latest medical technology is some conspiracy. Its solid capitalistic enterprise and corporate image fluff. The machines are real and are helpful. I’ve used them along with my doctors. They work. If they did not I would be dead and you would not be reading this.

Earlier in life I was a university campus security officer who worked the graveyard shift and with the very sort of wonderful people who responded with such courage and service to the real bombers in Boston. I recall a man we dug out of a university garden one summer night who upon being awakened by me began rambling about the idea that the CIA, the FBI, the United Nations and even the university were all conspiring to kill him. I later heard our dispatcher give us the information on this guy from previous reports and based on the legit photo ID’s he was carrying over our radios. He was a paranoid schizophrenic off his meds. I believe that to this day since both the two responding police officers and I had dealt with these folks for years. They were ill. There is nothing more to it than that.

The conspiracy laden media we presently inhabit makes Alex Jones mirror that guy we dug out of the flower beds on a summer night after midnight—full of filth, with a full growth of beard and who obviously was dehydrated and whose very illness prevented him from seeing reality. I’d seen the guy before on campus: a nice man with an illness that was challenging him to the core.

Reducing the Boston Marathon bombings to a U.S. government conspiracy against its own people or blaming the Earth’s almost two billion Muslims for harboring the same views and behaviors is a denial of reality equal to this man in the garden at midnight on a university campus but on a mass scale. We’ve essentially put this guy on television and radio with a large audience and named him Alex Jones or Glenn Beck. Only here, the two men are a lot better at raking in the cash than the man I encountered in the early 1980’s along with a host of people we all had nicknames for as a kind of code to be able to ID them all the more rapidly. There was Tunnel Man, Angel, and so many more. They had not appeared in our paths by any conspiracy.

The state I worked for had turned loose large numbers of mentally ill people and they no longer had a reliable person to help them stay on their meds and give them the extra help they needed. Despite it all they are a wonderful lot of folks—that is except the blonde nymphomaniac. No, we males did not seek her out. Why? You’d think that would be an attractive combo for any male officer. We did not because she was ill, she never washed. She sought us out and did bizarre things if we did not steer clear. Yet I am proud to tell you it was our job to serve her and protect her too. The government of my state openly told the public they were doing this to cut the budget for the care of these people. End of conspiracy.

Now, Matt Drudge has tweeted that Alex Jones is the coming man in the conservative political pantheon. Glenn Beck persistently makes millions and retains influence out of proportion to his dwindling audience. Fox News and so many conservative radio talkers are convinced that our enemy is Islam itself and the people who espouse that faith.

First, branding an entire religious group as the core of our problem has been tried before. That was German National Socialism and the result was the Holocaust.

Second, the kind of people who know the most about that very small select group of Jihadists that DO exist in our world and who target the United States are Muslims themselves who hail from the very places the Jihadists do. And using the conservative’s twisted illogic we should kill the almost two billion people on this Earth who are Muslims at the first opportunity. That is a great sin to even contemplate. Fox News, Matt Drudge, Alex Jones and Glenn Beck are not reliable purveyors of public information as media outlets. Nativism, and xenophobia are rampant in this America.

What would the Christian, Muslim, or Jewish God say about that? I recall a man from Nazareth by the name of Jesus who preached love for our enemies and turning the other cheek to a slight. Making war on the billions of Muslims to protect us from some imagined threat seems rather extreme and enormously counter-productive to say nothing of the barbarity and immorality of such a thing.

Some who conservative anti-Muslims hate so much even serve in our government. One prominent spook (intelligence operative) that helped our government pinpoint Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden quickly for President George W. Bush is an American citizen and a Muslim. Most of the soldiers that do the most good in Afghanistan are people who can speak the local language from being immigrants from the region and knowing the culture.

Most conservative Fox News or radio talker devotees would be shocked to learn these things. The simple xenophobic response against real or imagined foreigners or minority groups of all kinds is so easy and has such a fatal allure—doesn’t it?

It takes more logic, thought, and native intelligence to see the world for what it is. To see its complexities, its ironies, the common thread of human experience and human nature born of that experience that runs through all societies and cultures.

Most of the bad things that happen in our world are not the result of a conspiracy. They are direct acts of moral wrong inflicted upon the innocent openly in our world. The massive cuts in both Social Security and Medicare that many now want and the real cuts of the Sequestration legislation passed by a very real bi-partisan Congress and used by Republicans to attack the present Administration for political gain are done in the open and are real. They do not require any sort of conspiracy whatsoever.

When two teenagers get drunk and run a car off the road and die in the crash and their high school graduating class mourns them and puts up a little monument to them at the school it is not a conspiracy. They made poor choices. When a fifteen-year-old girl who danced and performed for the President at his second inaugural is gunned down by gang members in Chicago it is not some black ops performed by government. They are real slime ball criminals who were shooting it out over some turf battle and the girl was in the line of fire.

The moon landings are real. 9/11 was not launched by the U.S. against itself. Unfortunately that was a conspiracy of Al Qaeda supported by one element of the Taliban in Afghanistan. But it is not a conspiracy in the sense that it remains hidden from the world. Most conspiracies are revealed usually because somebody talks or makes a mistake—the footprint or forensic trail is clear enough.

That trail was obvious to Boston Police and the FBI in Boston a week ago. It is now. They are doing their jobs to protect us. I know the people who are police officers, firefighters, even some people I know worked for our government covertly (I strongly suspect). They are not conspirators. They are real flesh and blood people dealing with the reality of the world as it is.

It is time for the masses of us to abandon the false prophets and Christ wannabees , and hucksters who know how to sell us the fantastic and simplistic answers to the perplexities and sorrows of life. The variety and sophistication of the old Snake Oil salesmen of America’s past has grown exponentially with our media and its attendant technology. We must be more intelligent consumers of information. Yes, test what we hear, see, and experience. Weigh it, and act using the most factual and logical data available to us in keeping with our own life experience which is genuine.

Let us not give in to our prejudices or hatred. Let us not turn to simplistic emotionally satisfying answers to life’s questions and challenges but turn to critical evaluation of what we see, hear, and know. We’ll find far fewer conspiracies out there and will be closer to the love and kindness commanded by our Creator when we do.

Dr. Thomas Martin Sobottke
for Struggles for Justice

Guns, Filibusters and Pizza Orders Make for Dysfunctional Democracy

Posted in Community and Citizen Action, National Affairs on April 18, 2013 by thomassobottke

Let’s call this what it is: the United States Senate, that previously great deliberative body of great distinction has fallen so low it cannot muster a vote to break a cowardly filibuster to bring a bill calling for background checks on all guns sales co-sponsored by one Democrat and one Republican in true bipartisan fashion and that already has 54 of all the 100 Senators supporting the bill to the floor for an actual vote on the bill itself.

Yesterday’s travesty of a fully dysfunctional U.S. Senate, unresponsive to the pleas of over 90 percent of the wishes of American people, refused to bring the Gun Background Check Bill to an actual vote is now known to us all.

Yesterday’s shameful display of unresponsiveness to the real needs of human beings who live in the United States was not even the real vote on the bill: it was a vote to overcome a Senate Filibuster. We must ask Senators why this bill was filibustered in the first place. Let’s have a vote. Americans know where they stand. Do you?

Previously, the filibuster had a long and proud history in the Senate. It was truly the stuff of Frank Capra’s 1939 Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, where a minority of Senators who need to delay legislation that is going to pass can stop the Senate from acting and bring to the attention of the American people some great injustice or even in its most negative terms to prolong injustice long enough for Americans to see that great wrong.

But the Senate has voted to change the rules regarding filibusters. Now you do not need to even stand manfully or womanfully on the Senate floor and speak against a piece of legislation to block legislating activity that is much needed by the people for their government to take action. You merely call up the Senate majority leader’s office on the phone and say you are Filibustering a piece of legislation and so then the entire Senate has to fight to get to a vote to break that phoned in Filibuster via a single representative.

How many votes are needed to break a Filibuster? Sixty votes. If the vote was to be on an Amendment to the Constitution itself, or to remove a President from office, or to approve a treaty of far reaching importance with another nation only six more votes would be required.

In practice now Filibusters are used as a matter of routine. A bill that is not filibustered is rare indeed. So instead of 51 votes, 60 votes are needed now to pass all legislation. We may as well make the Filibuster something automatic and raise the level of all legislation to the two thirds majority support level of only select bills.

In point of fact, one of the chief defects of the old Articles of Confederation that was replaced with our present Constitution was that routine legislation required a 2/3 majority to pass and amendments to the flawed articles required a unanimous vote.

Try this experiment at your next large gathering. Ask people what pizza they would insist upon ordering by the entire group if only one type of pizza (this representing a bill in one form before the Senate) could be ordered.

You will find that there will be no majority support for any type of pizza. The senate gun background check bill already has majority support—even more than for a single type of pizza ordered for a party! That ought to be enough to bring it to a vote.

What failed yesterday was in fact not the actual vote on the bill and its merits or flaws, but a refusal to even bring that bill to a vote. That’s how bad it got on the Senate floor yesterday.

Given that ninety percent of Americans (as much as 93% in one poll) know what kind of legislative pizza they want to order concerning gun background checks it should sound and feel absurd that our Senate could not even agree to vote on the citizen’s request for this legislation.

It is like getting 93 out of a 100 people at a party to all agree they want cheese and anchovy pizza. When has that ever happened? Are pigs flying past your window?

Who does our government serve? That was one of the President’s questions yesterday. It is the main one to be known and answered. Does the Senate represent and serve the broad mass of the American citizenry, those ninety-three percent who favor this bill and so want it to be voted on at least and presumably pass with such unprecedented support?

No, the cowards could not do it. They work for a small minority who threaten them with electoral defeat in the next election and who must sell more weapons to Americans and reap greater profits as the death toll rises from gun violence nationwide.

Every single day 88 Americans die by guns. They killed at least 88 more Americans yesterday. They might have saved a few or even more as the legislation took hold.

It’s obvious that when legislative bills have majority support they can and sometimes should be filibustered. You never know if a flaw exists that might need exposing first before a vote is taken. But not always. And not when a bill has bipartisan support in the Senate via its co-sponsors and such broad public support and is so needed for the public safety.

And most importantly not when pigs fly past our windows and it reaches 100 degrees in April in Wisconsin and 93 out of 100 American citizens say this is what they want their Government to do for them.

The failure of the U.S. Senate to break that Filibuster yesterday was a cowardly display of a government body that has become dysfunctional.
Harry Reid should NEVER have permitted the current over-permissive Filibuster rule to remain. We must go back to the days when Senators must have the courage of their convictions and must do more than simply make a routine phone call to block the will of the American people. They should have to remain standing and speak without stopping to tell us why we cannot do what the people have told them they most want their Government to act upon.

For in the end, we are now filibustering the exercise of our very democracy itself.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers